- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
發表於 2025-1-4 02:48:33
|
顯示全部樓層
Mohamed El Kholy , Rasha Tarif Hamza * , Mohamed Saleh and Heba Elsedfy
D& v' C! B# f, `# b, U1 t& x8 DPenile length and genital anomalies in Egyptian
2 a8 s* U0 [8 m: y0 v, Vmale newborns: epidemiology and influence of
! V4 l) [' _% f+ d& t/ ~ bendocrine disruptors
- b/ r: `% v; J+ C' DAbstract: This is an attempt to establish the normal! d( Y6 d0 L3 o* |7 E
stretched penile length and prevalence of male geni-4 `. I3 r2 V# k
tal anomalies in full-term neonates and whether they
& Y1 d e; R) b5 y; Fare influenced by prenatal parental exposure to endo-6 {. L. x% M( p' }& U6 u
crine-disrupting chemicals. A thousand newborns were! }) a3 D) G9 y8 h! N
included; their mothers were subjected to the following) f8 j( x" I2 B2 m, F
questionnaire: parents ’ age, residence, occupation, con-
1 j, A1 f9 Z" x' v( v9 Htact with insecticides and pesticides, antenatal exposure$ b! s; m. E+ {) V- S8 G8 k2 F
to cigarette smoke or drugs, family history of genital
5 `+ b8 S! t) o. c+ G9 qanomalies, phytoestrogens intake and history of in vitro, N8 |: H. ~! Q1 l
fertilization or infertility. Free testosterone was measured0 s1 v/ Q* W0 l5 f! P& }
in 150 neonates in the first day of life. Mean penile length0 h. j5 h* @9 Q7 H: B
was 3.4 ± 0.37 cm. A penile length < 2.5 cm was considered* p: M) N9 r3 j% p( x6 d9 \2 y
micropenis. Prevalence of genital anomalies was 1.8 %
' e8 a) c1 [0 {, c) Z9 f5 W$ R(hypospadias 83.33 % ). There was a higher rate of anoma-
, [/ ]- u" v2 Y" Wlies in those exposed to endocrine disruptors (EDs; 7.4 % )
4 @* b4 M: j) n; K( @& ]$ Jthan in the non-exposed (1.2 % ; p < 0.0001; odds ratio 6,0 y/ O, C* D* ~' R7 A m1 f# w$ g [
95 % confidence interval 2 – 16). Mean penile length showed
6 f6 ~3 o' v8 a( Da linear relationship with free testosterone and was lower
, S, E% | V/ d* Q* r" yin neonates exposed to EDs.
. f: {9 ?* v; ^$ AKeywords: endocrine disruptors; genital anomalies; male;
& m* z$ @' Y- Q! S" U6 xpenile length; testosterone.; s, s, J' ]( [
*Corresponding author : Rasha Tarif Hamza, MD, Faculty of
) Y' o# F1 ?; C, ?; oMedicine, Department of Pediatrics, Ain Shams University, 36( [* e9 e" ?- W K9 F. w# l' i8 N' C7 H
Hisham Labib Street, off Makram Ebeid Street, Nasr City, Cairo
8 W: D4 d6 B: D" A: g( o; t S4 k11371, Cairo, Egypt, Phone: + 20-2-22734727, Fax: + 20-2-26904430 ,
! G. C. n) d. p# u) G/ [: ~7 qE-mail: [email protected], R0 _+ q, \9 P' h, d
Mohamed El Kholy, Mohamed Saleh and Heba Elsedfy: Faculty of6 U9 p/ F# c1 V4 m# ~$ b# C
Medicine , Department of Pediatrics, Ain Shams University, Cairo,
1 X5 w+ j* U C9 J' i$ D: A' qEgypt5 U7 L$ E" a2 }4 _; f
Introduction& E( z. c% ~0 J- X6 d
Determination of penile size is employed clinically in
( I* q: d4 D; p# \! ~- E8 Sthe evaluation of children with abnormal genital devel-
" v5 p: x9 y3 {opment, such as, for example, micropenis, defined as a
* e7 Q6 K! ], Lpenis that is normal in terms of shape and function, but is4 J$ S4 c4 c$ q* d
more than 2.5 standard deviations (SD) smaller than mean3 g' Y8 }0 y l& T: z% u, b
size in terms of length (1) . However, these measurements
: c3 K4 R9 H5 i' ecan be subject to significant international variations, in4 i) s/ _' \3 c" O& }4 L
addition to being obtained with different methodologies
, S7 P) [( ]7 |" ]in some cases (2) .
# z! ^7 L- a3 [' I2 \2 |Over the past 20 years, the documented increase in
0 X% x7 P1 A2 C* S2 W+ vdisorders of male sexual differentiation, such as hypo-& o# f0 j6 p1 m6 ] @, w
spadias, cryptorchidism, and micropenis, has led to the; E* Q1 T. o9 m) x7 i5 }* b
suspicion that environmental chemicals are detrimental
: p \* O' R7 u- h- Kto normal male genital development in utero (3) . The so-4 c/ D3 m0 t8 l) s: f' t9 _1 V, x
called Sharpe-Skakkebaek hypothesis offered a possible
& _6 ^% D- k. Z3 D6 u$ Jcommon cause and toxicological mechanism for abnor-
! d5 W$ q) j6 A! ?) `- Wmalities in men and boys – that is, increased exposure to& S; E2 G$ E! K8 u0 ]9 ~' H1 n
oestrogen in utero may interfere with the multiplication
& J0 }$ {- K# p& J6 ~; L6 w& n Jof fetal Sertoli cells, resulting in hormonally mediated
% v- @) n' e7 a4 Hdevelopmental effects and, after puberty, reduced quality
4 e1 J6 Y4 x' y- l8 d% bof semen (4) .1 t) o8 I# d3 a E% p8 r7 [( F* ^
It has been proposed that these disorders are part of
7 u7 _4 i% h# R0 E" d8 H% J# Aa single common underlying entity known as the testicu-# h8 g# W$ `1 S$ l; k1 j
lar dysgenesis syndrome (TDS) (5) . TDS comprises various& A# Q5 Z, d; |% t/ H4 ^
aspects of impaired gonadal development and function,: s8 w! W3 [& G) U: v. ^, F
including abnormal spermatogenesis, cryptorchidism,
1 R, d4 |) R$ \9 ^4 g2 T$ c1 Zhypospadias, and testicular cancer (6) .
( N8 Y0 T5 g/ y- l$ uThe etiological basis for this condition is complex: _- F( T6 k; L5 y, e! r
and is thought to be due to a combination of both genetic
2 F, d I" Z# S6 B$ g* b0 Eand environmental factors that result in the disruption, }! ]' F# H! ]& M! ~6 j& e
of normal gonadal development during fetal life. First,
- l7 k3 Y; r$ P( E8 Zit was proposed that environmental chemicals with oes- z; `+ y( n0 E0 y% Q7 |
trogen-like actions could have adverse effects on male) J2 z0 Z( A5 [6 l5 b& Q8 R
gonadal development. This has since been expanded to2 q& A( h& p" j- h! c1 y
include environmental chemicals with anti-androgen1 }6 b. M# ]* f+ i( n# W/ W
actions and it is now thought that an imbalance between4 K2 l1 w1 C$ Q6 Y+ M
androgen and oestrogen activity is the key mechanism by! S2 j- r4 c e! h1 f7 Y
which exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs)
, n. J: N3 A+ u8 qresults in the development of TDS and male reproductive
* C6 e: y9 H I+ Htract abnormalities (5) .
u# T0 p% ?4 g( V7 i' J6 UWith the increasing use of environmental chemicals,
; i7 N4 O6 C1 Han attempt was made to establish the normal stretched
) d V) n! w Tpenile length as well as the prevalence of male genital( s) t; U! E( c% W
anomalies in full-term neonates and whether there is an
* _+ J7 J4 X8 N# X; c uinfluence of prenatal parental exposure to potential EDCs3 Z2 [9 g5 L/ r3 G- a! r, J7 t9 o/ m3 E
on these parameters.# `$ Z% _, Y5 u
Brought to you by | University of California - San Francisco8 M( t( W4 e& M! n
Authenticated" J6 K; V/ a& |9 n# P1 q2 i. p
Download Date | 2/18/15 4:26 AM
6 \- B# ~" A, x510 El Kholy et al.: Penile length and male genital anomalies
6 y# K/ ]- p: k I9 k% A% J# PSubjects and methods
2 d K, k/ M2 _! nStudy population
; U+ W/ ~" z1 U( VThe study was conducted as a prospective cohort study at the Univer-
8 Z& b! W! _) |& X) V* p: Z3 z( tsity Hospital of Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. A sample of 1000- u8 t$ m" t c0 d. ~
male full-term newborns was studied.% P: d6 I, \, H6 H+ c
Sampling technique$ u6 a$ p- o* Y5 x1 R0 {6 ~' E
Three days per week were selected randomly out of 7 days. In each
' t9 f1 B; c+ y4 `6 D h( G' Kday, all male full-term deliveries were selected during the time of fi eld
' R3 j0 {8 h; N/ |0 d" Y# Y# |study (12 h) during the period from March 2007 to November 2007.$ b. X9 C+ D- |" \6 D* [/ ?
Statistical analysis) E- l* C+ c! k9 {4 c9 c5 Y$ |, K
The computer program SPSS for Windows release 11.0 (SPSS Inc.,
) ]6 x; q5 ] p1 `; d6 K& |3 r- CChicago, IL, USA) was used for data entry and analysis. All numeric1 [$ n. k8 h; `6 a' e' A3 k
variables were expressed as mean ± SD. Comparison of diff erent vari-& {4 ^; z( h" E
ables between two groups was done using the Student ’ s t-test for
2 W9 [& P- y* T& ~2 M4 s" B* Onormally distributed variables. Comparisons of multiple groups were
# A. y/ r: _ ^. u' |1 g( i" Zdone using analysis of variance and post hoc tests for normally dis-
* c) V6 j/ t% @% i4 _# h* Ztributed variables. The χ 2 -test was used to compare the frequency of
6 A7 p" r5 e; Dqualitative variables among the diff erent groups; the Fisher exact test
7 v8 b& B" N8 j J" O/ p" rwas performed in tables containing values < 5. The Pearson correla-! G7 c9 J+ X% |: L0 `
tion test was used for correlating various variables. For all tests, a! E# R9 k9 w. w9 w
probability (p) < 0.05 was considered signifi cant (10) .6 x# `) g. s. Q( U
Results
% X9 p( [- w# V' pData collected' |: i* V/ n/ P+ u+ }
A researcher completed a structured questionnaire during inter-2 q$ X" g) M8 i" ^* o9 R/ N( }. ~
views with the mothers. The questionnaire gathered information6 n! i/ j# v' n' \4 E
on the following: age of parents; residence; occupation of the# A, e( \6 Z8 A! Q5 a5 D
parents; contact with insecticides and pesticides and their type and
& r* ?0 e2 K/ y6 J( e* n& Y( {! ?frequency of contact; maternal exposure to cigarette smoke during* Q+ }3 Y& I9 h, m
pregnancy; maternal drug history during gestation; family history
# D4 |% s" G5 A( U) S" I8 ^of hypospadias, cryptorchidism, or other congenital anomalies; in-: F1 q* W, J% [" k5 Q
take of foods containing phytoestrogens, e.g., soy beans, olive oil,; r6 w/ }8 H w7 C2 x
garlic, hummus, sesame seed, and their frequency; and, also, his-
( X* @3 b! p- J8 ]1 Ltory of in vitro fertilization or infertility (type of infertility and drugs
, m% y; j7 P# A$ g% a, kgiven).
) G: ?8 T& H9 n$ ~2 ^& ~Environmental exposure to chemicals was evaluated for its po-$ f3 F$ y8 ~ s$ h" `( k
tential of causing endocrine disruption. Chemicals were classifi ed# ~- {1 S& G, H% j8 _
into two groups on the basis of scientifi c evidence for their having3 D7 | v1 P, S# e5 E' N: e
endocrine-disrupting properties: group I: evidence of endocrine dis-1 J& I+ `3 b( _* m0 s2 D v! y
ruption high and medium exposure concern; group II: no evidence of* o/ J* Y" u9 _% h/ ]( \
endocrine disruption and low exposure concern (7) .
% z3 D, G7 c( n8 O/ eDescriptive data
- q5 V( L. u& F1 f3 _+ ~0 QThe mean age of newborns ’ fathers was 36 ± 6 years (range0 ?: A/ P4 D: Y0 D; z& C2 R- |
20 – 50 years) and that of mothers was 26 ± 5 years (range
% s( `; u1 c3 S& Z9 r+ @. V19 – 42 years). Exposure to EDs started long before preg-
! ^4 n. K( }6 }4 I+ ~nancy and continued throughout pregnancy. Regard-
$ W* o! B$ @( ~; n6 U. fing therapeutic history during pregnancy, 99 mothers
S& t; _, y. P4 `7 \, G d(9.9 % ) received progestins, 14 (1.4 % ) received insulin,1 n- d }" E1 r# U& j
6 (0.6 % ) received heparin, 4 (0.04 % ) received long-
' B* R# [0 P7 F, L. V$ C4 g# I8 m) Tacting penicillin, 3 (0.3 % ) received aspirin, 2 (0.2 % )
( j) w& o% o: T* J+ C: Wreceived B2 agonist, and 1 (0.1 % ) received thyroxin,$ F6 j- e: }; {6 V7 \1 |* [
while the rest did not receive any medications during
5 E; A7 S: N( h) j0 Q/ Dpregnancy except for the known multivitamins and9 |. r3 d4 F- ]! h3 S+ Y
calcium supplementations. In addition, family history
' V( O5 @9 S8 L7 ~! Xof newborns born small for gestational age was positive; i' `/ h/ a1 y$ ~* h
in 21 cases (2.1 % ).( W" B. \6 o( H" r8 ?
Examination
0 i5 p' |6 z. `; P- i" ~. `) C% I" YIn addition to the full examination by the paediatric staff , each boy
3 m3 W1 Q- K( o* }. }$ t) Iwas examined for anomalies of the external genitalia during the+ _; l2 I e" n' C* ^
fi rst 24 h of life by one specially trained researcher. Examination
, `! ~% q8 ^# F4 ^. y% @% b! K: t( S/ z0 fof the genital system included measurement of stretched penile
" v2 }4 `# k9 k0 Klength (8) and examination of external genitalia for congenital
2 z3 @& `9 Y' `6 C4 e, \# ]anomalies such as cryptorchidism (9) and hypospadias. Hypospa-
! ^- J- v; n2 G# Z. zdias was graded as not glanular, coronal, penile, penoscrotal, scro-- q6 v8 Y& Z/ z& g2 a3 G2 U0 Z. B6 n
tal, or perineal according to the anatomical position. Cases of iso-
0 [% N5 i) ]; b* ]+ B0 ?lated malformed foreskin without hypospadias were not included
; \. a5 z" Q2 @7 D( Oas cases.2 C4 V) f( u% g" i
Penile length
8 w4 |9 |9 `3 r: o* b3 WLaboratory investigations
6 T+ ^$ m- ?$ [* ^Free testosterone level was measured in 150 randomly chosen neo-2 p$ k% i4 |8 n7 t" }8 c8 {
nates from the studied sample in the fi rst day of life (enzyme im-. Q* `$ k; M# a" ~% G) R
munoassay test supplied by Diagnostics Biochem Canada, Inc.,
/ R8 U& R+ |/ b$ F/ VDorchester, Ontario, Canada).
5 L m8 Y7 F1 J0 ?7 I$ rMean penile length was 3.41 ± 0.37 cm (range 2.4 – 4.6 cm).
% v; {! U& Q: _4 fA penile length < 2.5 cm was considered micropenis ( < the2 G+ `2 ^# e, Z7 ` @2 d
mean by 2.5 SD). Two cases (0.2 % ) were considered to. A- \3 ?4 V0 V0 R
have micropenis. Mean penile length was lower (p = 0.041)
/ n" S8 c( M8 k6 win neonates exposed to EDs (n = 81, 3.1 cm) compared to the
0 a( I; d+ U- ]) e: r, Z5 G' F1 z! mnon-exposed group (n = 919, 3.4 cm; Figure 1 ).
6 h# t( D8 y+ z* [9 R2 b3 L6 _6 tThere was a linear relationship between penile length) k: }# u; N4 O* D( w; }
and the length of the newborn with a regression coef-
/ x# O5 Q+ C0 a; yficient of 0.05 (95 % CI 0.04 – 0.06; p < 0.0001), i.e., there
. z- _0 ~% O$ p# H& Kwas an increase of 0.05 cm for each unit increase in length
8 u5 I* l7 J8 `8 C/ a$ n# a1 @(cm). Similarly, there was a linear relationship between; u& k; S+ }1 s7 M( a9 _5 E8 y
penile length and the weight of the newborn with a regres- r& I# L; _ z" ^" C+ [; K% N
sion coefficient of 0.14 (95 % CI 0.09 – 0.18; p < 0.0001), i.e.,
9 M( i+ H! V/ P! cthere was an increase of 0.14 cm for each unit increase in
9 O0 J0 k; F }& _* ?2 \weight (kg).
1 |: {! ?" Q* z# [ S! HBrought to you by | University of California - San Francisco
9 J( I! L( t4 H- I4 rAuthenticated$ Y1 j& k: ]' ~, u3 ]* v
Download Date | 2/18/15 4:26 AM
m. T3 ]$ Z, m3 dEl Kholy et al.: Penile length and male genital anomalies 511
4 }1 L; L: r# @; J3.45% ?) U e2 a7 T% B- A
3.405 p/ @3 g% H0 B4 f9 V' M$ y
3.35
4 G \$ O; a" b) B3.30
U8 N- c: `3 R( C3.25
( J+ V7 r" a7 ~; h7 V3.20
0 z* M( _# n- W- `3.15
; ]8 G1 m0 g( V7 ]3.10
& d4 I2 a: \; E n- O8 c3.05$ u3 F! P3 e% t! f m
3.00. S" D# o8 A" ]6 s; X! U
2.95" W# R$ S0 i* v$ Q" R
2.90: m4 |; @5 ] e- w) I1 F7 g
Mean* }) r% y" A4 U8 z2 F
penile
7 ^: x- ~) X/ J w2 ]0 Nlength/ ^2 Y2 S8 A8 a* M1 E
an odds ratio of 6 (95 % CI 2 – 16), i.e., the exposed persons( y, j. u0 `1 W
were six times more likely to develop anomalies than
9 U( m5 Q. R- m. ^$ {0 Lthose not exposed (Table 1 ).9 [& Y' L$ |. @7 L! |
Genital anomalies were detected in the offspring, c" Z1 n K% N
of those exposed to chlorinated hydrocarbons (9.52 % ),3 ]2 A4 ~9 J* L* u- B) Q) r
phthalate esters (8.70 % ), and heavy metals (6.25 % ). In3 @. |( M4 l8 g- |0 ?
contrast, none of the newborns exposed to phenols had
' s! {6 O% z9 \& R& Fgenital anomalies (Table 2 ).
/ r/ o f3 @6 |2 O- U$ F) bExposed
$ F3 v3 n* B2 K. q- I+ G2 c$ F7 T+ HNon exposed/ l. p- T' f9 w( C/ e+ o T) D; I& A
Penile lengths according to exposure to endocrine8 R7 D$ g1 s6 m9 B; ]4 i. b
Figure 1 disruptors.$ f; x% `) {; e3 C' @
Serum free testosterone levels- i" l4 B8 S* y$ y; W$ s8 ~
Exposure to cigarette smoke and progestins
# N0 N6 i$ z6 e: ~+ vduring the first trimester, l5 Y" v3 B3 _1 l4 W+ Z
None of the mothers in the study was an active smoker;: h, {" q9 a2 i2 q
350 were only exposed through passive smoking. There
' L" C) Z% a/ `/ [8 A+ Uwas no difference between rates of anomalies among
! V: r2 i* u) Z7 V6 {. x/ _those exposed to cigarette smoke when compared to those" O6 T H4 M3 i
not exposed (1.1 % vs. 2.2 % ). Similarly, there was no differ-% e" b% C5 i* j: \- d
ence between the rates of anomalies among those exposed
0 ]+ B# A; ` m8 ]2 t% ^to progestins during the first trimester when compared to
& r$ i8 M M r5 @. e Q6 R; zthe non-exposed ones (2 % vs. 1.8 % ).
- k/ q9 A4 e4 w ~5 }5 m4 ^In the first day of life, serum free testosterone levels
) @2 e* ^0 w5 \ O, Dranged between 7.2 and 151 pg/mL (mean 61.9 ± 38.4 pg/mL;
) W' p/ F3 o- Xmedian 60 pg/mL). There was a linear relationship$ g! A" f7 T9 g" {
between penile length and testosterone level of the
$ S" @. a# o. h/ q+ _: s: }newborn with a regression coefficient of 0.002 (95 % CI/ @- `. l+ z m5 E% b3 R2 G- b
0.0004 – 0.003; p = 0.01), i.e., there was an increase of 0.2 cm
0 | ?3 {: X; U: n% rin penile length per 100 pg/mL increase in testosterone
" R7 l! S5 P" R; O& R0 ?( Ilevel. Moreover, serum testosterone level was significantly1 @! t0 O& ~8 ^
lower in newborns exposed to EDs (49.50 ± 22.3 pg/mL)
0 D$ L( E" n+ B( H2 O, uthan in the non-exposed group (72.20 ± 31.20 pg/mL;
, m7 y/ X! N( `9 X1 a1 ip < 0.01).* K6 ^3 z9 l" H0 {1 j* b6 ^" o) w
Table 1 Frequency of genital anomalies according to type of
1 k/ O9 H" a2 G9 }9 y, n( _exposure to endocrine disruptors.3 i9 t1 v8 F9 o' h7 ?+ R1 f1 p
Exposure to endocrine
1 y& [& j/ D, k$ ~- Fdisruptors
0 d% R4 h# G/ O( f" q$ `Prevalence of genital anomalies
1 R3 A) M3 X5 X. m5 g. U, D4 oAnomalies Total
) P+ O# A/ E# A4 B1 ?# q4 e0 eNegative Positive
& g8 F( U) p" HNegative exposure 908 11 919
6 M$ m4 Z, \, o3 _( d98.8 % 1.2 % 100.0 %7 A" s8 f& G3 J7 Y
Positive exposure 75 6 81
5 b2 D5 O5 U* T" C5 }92.6 % 7.4 % 100.0 % t+ q! Z9 E$ W- K1 \' C
Total 983 17 10000 h0 _" y2 ?2 L- _: |7 h4 Q/ R
98.3 % 1.7 % 100.0 %
$ O1 F7 J% D. q9 ^; `$ q# W9 ^1 w7 Uχ 2 = 25.05, p < 0.0001.- j) }. r5 b8 G
Over the study period, the birth prevalence of genital
" n# ^2 w1 r2 R* I# E% V! Nanomalies was 1.8 % , i.e., 18/1000 live birth. Hypospadias
[" o* g' N0 P5 o; eaccounted for 83.33 % of the cases. Fourteen had glanu-
. ?) o* f8 N) |' P, A7 e% _lar hypospadias and one had coronal hypospadias. One, `: ?1 J6 z' b: F& m
had penile torsion and another had penile chordee. Right-
. R( _4 G* _) M5 h' b4 L$ msided cryptorchidism was present in one newborn.6 i' H7 ~0 K3 S/ t4 N. ?
Exposure to EDCs
: O, c6 }" b4 K9 ^# ]0 C: V7 [Among the whole sample, 81 newborns (8.10 % ) were
* S8 e+ t+ X# W6 W I$ Y% \( rexposed to EDs. The duration of exposure varied from
6 ^, ^3 s2 Y: G f6 B2 to 32 years with a frequency of exposure ranging from
6 u2 N' X% e& Bweekly to 2 – 3 months per year.
4 J0 J% {: F# ~! f7 f" EThere was a significantly higher rate of anomalies* a; I# C! f% U7 `& x1 K
among those who were exposed to EDs when compared
- k% w2 O, B1 H; }6 d) W( A! ato non-exposed newborns (7.4 % vs. 1.2 % ; p < 0.0001), with. w: R( S7 ]( M. c- k" I* Y$ o( y* ^; b3 Y' x
Table 2 Type of endocrine disruptor and percentage of anomalies in
9 }1 J& g5 T N: w. Ithe group of neonates exposed to endocrine disruptors (n = 81).
. i5 \5 b4 x5 b; ]4 I$ `Anomalies Total/ A* x a/ j4 X' I) m' Z) B
Negative Positive) {, q+ b: c" }+ Z4 d
Chlorinated hydrocarbons (farmers) 19 2 21. m$ V# b5 [4 t' W: B% O
90.48 % 9.52 % 100.0 %3 |/ Q" W$ q, P
Heavy metals (iron smiths, welders) 30 2 32
0 n( r; h4 K2 @: E3 E1 L8 h, D, C93.75 % 6.25 % 100.0 %; ^/ _8 `( k% p+ K3 a
Phthalate esters (house painters) 21 2 23
& Y+ X) w% D. j! W0 ?$ f. J91.30 % 8.70 % 100.0 %6 Z# ~ Y8 q2 T& z; j
Phenols (car mechanics) 5 0 5: Y4 b& X* r7 p2 r' n" c1 ?' z. l" z
100.0 % 0 % 100.0 %. y0 o/ U3 S0 v7 F3 b. k
Total 75 6 81
8 _, _% G6 {, D$ E$ n92.60 % 7.40 % 100.0 %
) }( ]7 G/ k1 O" _( iBrought to you by | University of California - San Francisco
0 O! Q! c! B3 ^: `" g4 G$ V( `Authenticated7 H8 _' ?/ a/ e L3 }2 n$ y
Download Date | 2/18/15 4:26 AM
5 ` R) H% j( Y512 El Kholy et al.: Penile length and male genital anomalies M" _# C' T$ U( ?6 K* m
Discussion
% Z7 B9 o4 v8 ^7 BPreviously reported penile lengths varied from 2.86 to 3.75 cm
\ y1 G6 t! n+ n7 p- k4 e9 i, h(11 – 16) and depended on ethnicity. In Saudi Arabia (13) ,$ [% q' M2 G& x- Z5 u7 u5 {
mean newborn penile length was 3.55 ± 0.57 cm, slightly
- B- j2 `; A% fhigher than our mean value. However, the cut-off lower
2 F. q8 v2 F: s( p( {limit ( – 2.5 SD) was calculated to be 2.13 cm (vs. 2.5 cm in
\! D& G$ J4 ]; A0 Jour cohort). This emphasizes the importance of establish-
! c, }9 l. s. P8 K3 q; S# qing the normal values for each country because the normal. J. F$ V/ u5 H5 E2 e/ e
range could vary markedly. In a multiethnic community,3 l7 u- ]% Z' |0 x2 E
a mean length of – 2.5 SD was used for the definition of0 X! f7 x' L9 e2 x
micropenis and was 2.6, 2.5, and 2.3 cm for Caucasian,
' S ~+ h0 S8 Z' e: u/ J- hEast-Indian, and Chinese babies, respectively (p < 0.05).) e! @! \" E% Z0 a: d9 U5 l5 x
This is close to the widely accepted recommendation that) K- l1 R9 v4 k4 _: E- g
a penile length of 2.4 – 2.5 cm be considered as the lowest
; S9 U) W9 Q) l& r6 K# }/ O4 wlimit for the definition of micropenis (8) . The recognition
5 T1 n2 ~' c, [( |' o3 Xof micropenis is important, because it might be the only6 i$ B Z2 o) [
obvious manifestation of pituitary or hypothalamic hor-
, x9 e/ X( j6 G/ gmonal deficiencies (17) .
( K; a3 r& @; T& s0 C, H& A' IThe timing for measurement of testosterone in new-
. w* n8 Y0 ^/ w! _0 fborns is highly variable but, generally, during the first 2
. W! z0 S8 I0 S. {, r* aweeks of life (18) . In our study, serum testosterone level
) }1 |0 u$ _" ~$ a0 a8 Gwas measured in all newborns on day 1 in order to fix a
3 ?% \2 u2 _' {2 ftime for sample withdrawal in all newborns and, also, to
( M. s, r% B L1 A3 b9 Xmake sure that all samples were withdrawn before mothers
% F: ~( K( Z; n; ^7 _; @were discharged from the maternity hospital. We found a1 D/ c6 O; F: W
linear relationship between penile length and testosterone. i# c2 d B) M7 W+ C
levels of newborns. Mean penile length was lower in neo-+ M$ D( D$ n9 F/ X1 N V
nates exposed to EDs compared to the non-exposed group,
/ ^' `2 J V8 o; Rwhich could be related to the lower testosterone levels in) j8 q; J- s1 @ m/ }1 p% L8 N/ |/ _
the exposed group. The etiology of testicular dysgenesis
* a7 k F" j5 Wsyndrome (TDS) is suspected to be related to genetic and/or
" @6 g. g9 o; m3 senvironmental factors, including EDs. Few human studies+ w9 A) y% R9 B# o- }+ o
have found associations/correlations between EDs, includ-1 e+ Z5 P0 i8 ?$ a6 Z3 f. I2 R
ing phthalates, and the different TDS components (18) .
# k+ m4 @( q: i t3 VSome reports have suggested an increase in hypo-3 W" E( W! a2 W, x( Y, O
spadias rates during the period 1960 – 1990 in European
) W# s/ P& p) |0 F5 j: Yand US registries (19 – 23) . There are large geographical! n; S" ~7 s5 y
differences in reported hypospadias rates, ranging from2 `9 q( p& r% z4 I! t
2.0 to 39.7/10,000 live births (23 – 25) . Several explanations/ e; Y5 s& I7 I. H* ]4 R
have been proposed for the increasing trends and geo-% T! I! d0 n+ p' q2 k$ }
graphical differences. As male sexual differentiation is
4 T8 W8 `0 F- I+ Rcritically dependent on normal androgen concentrations,
9 b: g; Z# g3 R/ F+ iincreased exposure to environmental factors affecting( _) C: i" Z! Y7 s
androgen homeostasis during fetal life (e.g., EDs with
/ N9 K2 o7 v$ k6 \estrogenic or anti-androgenic properties) may cause0 Z5 W" x; S5 @! I y9 X' |; m
hypospadias (3, 4) .0 ~7 l9 P& R; _
In Western Australia, the average prevalence of hypo-
' L4 p7 n+ m+ ~+ N& u! N! `spadias in male infants was 67.7 per 10,000 male births.
: d4 m g) Q* U) S( _9 MWhen applying the EUROCAT definition (24), the average2 x, G. g' `3 V o- ?0 q
prevalence of hypospadias during 1980 – 2000 was 21.8 per
- g2 X3 X5 A4 H$ H10,000 births and the average annual prevalence increased: D. q5 m! w- o% O. u
significantly over the study period by 2.2 % per year. The2 P! Q, R" c2 N+ T& U, q) ~
prevalence of hypospadias in this study was much higher
& A- e! L& G4 \# _at 150 per 10,000; by excluding glanular hypospadias, the
* ~& F' y. {0 g% [+ v& [4 E, A: Gprevalence fell sharply to 10 per 10,000 (26) .; t9 ~. ]" P0 p& ~& }4 B
We found a higher rate of anomalies among newborns
. N9 v5 K) r- B: C$ zexposed to EDs when compared to non-exposed newborns
) K, r9 L/ B, O# A& \(7.4 % vs. 1.2 % ); this raises the issue that environmental) a3 }+ ?. W. {0 u0 _/ M& `! j
pollution might play a role in causing these anomalies.5 D4 P) p+ m* N
Within the last decade, several epidemiologic studies3 \- w( j# l$ U0 ^# G% p
have suggested environmental factors as a possible cause- |# k2 o$ U+ x0 o/ C9 a2 R
for the observed increased incidence of abnormalities in/ Z4 E' }1 Z& \
male reproductive health (27) . Parental environmental/' B& d, U7 o% d) j( F# M
occupational exposure to EDs before/during pregnancy& g0 j) @4 |3 \9 R1 x
indicates that fetal contamination may be a risk factor for6 m9 x* @- M& Z3 l' Z$ |
the development of male external genital malformation
3 r; `" N5 P7 X5 m4 i(27 – 29) .5 ]! W% g3 I0 K9 b4 p$ b! j/ ]
Received October 25, 2012; accepted January 27, 2013; previously
2 e5 ]9 ~* _/ A% Spublished online March 18, 20130 ?+ y$ s" t0 ?
References, \% D* x f$ j4 l2 `
1. Aaronson IA. Micropenis: medical and surgical implications. J/ s) D b% X( g
Urol 1994;152:4 – 14.
* Q! S9 O! N' U5 h4 [2. Gabrich PN, Vasconcelos JS, Dami ã o R, Silva EA. Penile anthro-
9 S: r! B' {' @! ^ |pometry in Brazilian children and adolescents. J Pediatr (Rio J)- I( N3 ` L- x# }0 {/ u7 x' J* P
2007;83:441 – 6.- N: v6 \6 w3 N' b
3. Sultan C, Balaguer P, Terouanne B, Georget V, Paris F, et al.; ?5 u7 x" `# _: H( P& d) x
Environmental xenoestrogens, antiandrogens and disorders of J3 C, W3 c. }5 C" D/ M
male sexual differentiation. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2001;10:178:
6 w$ `" ~; A% f6 _8 _( [, l; o99 – 105.( U* B/ |3 t, D& N
4. Sharpe RM, Skakkeb æ k NE. Are oestrogens involved in falling
6 p# f9 _8 l6 }sperm counts and disorders of the male reproductive tract ?
, N% s7 y' c4 l: b: WLancet 1993;341:1392 – 5.
0 E& f% J1 m1 m3 ]) ~& g5. Acerini CL, Hughes IA. Endocrine disrupting chemicals: a new1 b" p+ f6 o+ X' ?0 o
and emerging public health problem ? Arch Dis Child 2006;91:
! B: K1 Y/ I0 b- }7 H0 {( F633 – 41.
) q3 ? {; Q4 @0 `: K+ X) R6. Joensen UN, J ø rgensen N, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Skakkebaek NE.
: j- m4 n; a& @. Q3 L5 B9 gTesticular dysgenesis syndrome and Leydig cell function. Basic3 Q/ P" G9 N, n7 A
Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2008;102:155 – 61.! c3 ]0 G' o- u1 D/ ]- X4 M! w5 u6 F M
7. IEH. Chemicals purported to be endocrine disruptors: a* c/ t4 w K: q, h
compilation of published lists. (Web Report W20), Leicester,* s, V& Y$ E# c' i
UK: MRC Institute for Environmental Health, 2005. Accessed on
6 ?( H! ~' I8 |% A8 z# \4 B- l: O9 gMarch 2005. Available at http://www.le.ac.uk/ieh/.
/ m; O! n) s1 K7 F2 M8 n" H8. Cheng PK, Chanoine JP. Should the definition of micropenis vary$ r; f2 P" b) Y! y' N6 ^
according to ethnicity ? Horm Res 2001;55:278 – 81.
' d9 X3 Y. k0 W: `! |& vBrought to you by | University of California - San Francisco* [$ T' K2 n' Y
Authenticated+ \5 H0 h" n; W9 w+ }
Download Date | 2/18/15 4:26 AM3 p, D3 D3 U1 N1 L
El Kholy et al.: Penile length and male genital anomalies 513: L+ ?9 k# |4 Y S* {. P* ~
21. K ä ll é n B, Bertollini R, Castilla E, Czeizel A, Knudsen LB, et al./ C4 j% a, ~1 g+ Y+ R
A joint international study on the epidemiology of hypospadias.
; [5 Y0 r: C/ H: w; _& vActa Paediatr Scand 1986;324(Suppl):1 – 52.; ^8 i8 a3 V" M% Q% O
22. Paulozzi LJ, Erickson JD, Jackson RJ. Hypospadias trends in two
J/ Q$ M/ U3 v7 M4 ^% r8 D. cUS surveillance systems. Pediatrics 1997;100:831 – 4.
% x& h4 c; D* b$ F* ]; Hpenile length in newborn and infants. BJU Int 1999;84 : 1093 – 4.. l) N# |! B8 `( O8 ^+ C1 h0 @# @
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2000;13 : 55 – 62.2 |8 P: }' D( c( D$ O0 ]7 k$ H' v$ C
Vasudevan G, Manivarmane B, Bhat BV, Bhatia BD, Kumar S.' g) N: m7 s0 L/ x7 y( o
Genital standards for south Indian male newborns. Indian J
# V$ v1 W n i5 }5 J9. Scorer CG. The incidence of incomplete descent of the testicle at
* U# y8 k. n# P/ _8 M% o6 \; vbirth. Arch Dis Child 1956;31:198 – 202.
7 L8 i+ G/ ~( q" h10. Daniel WW. Biostatistics: a foundation for analysis in the health) b( l3 ?! t0 X) U9 ^
sciences, 6th ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1995.
( m3 r* s! ^8 T! g11. Flatau E, Josefsberg Z, Reisner SH, Bialik O, Iaron Z. Letter:/ p. p. L* K E i, D9 u
penile size in the newborn infants. J Pediatr 1975;87:663 – 4.
* w7 F2 _6 \0 |12. Ozbey H, Temiz A, Salman T. A simple method for measuring+ j, q% H, b) ~9 [! i+ n+ y
13. Al-Herbish AS. Standard penile size for normal full term, B7 E% N2 I+ p' W3 K( t* O. Y
newborns in the Saudi population. Saudi Med J 2002;23:314 – 6.: r3 g6 ]8 l, C5 r- C; F
14. Lian WB, Lee WR, Ho LY. Penile length of newborns in Singapore.; V+ f, q# V+ _. t5 @' S" K
15. Pediatr 1995;62:593 – 6.: Z! z3 r4 @. E9 `. Q4 ^7 Y$ i/ o' y
16. Boas M, Boisen KA, Virtanen HE, Kaleva M, Suomi AM, et al.
) e1 q6 v$ {5 n5 T+ p# M9 w% uPostnatal penile length and growth rate correlate to serum9 c' p" f/ R5 K/ g
testosterone levels: a longitudinal study of 1962 normal boys.. }4 Q" f$ G8 L J& C
Eur J Endocrinol 2006;154:125 – 9.
8 b1 d. H, r0 `* @3 d* `" l17. Camurdan AD, Oz MO, Ilhan MN, Camurdan OM, Sahin F,
& Q' p2 K8 \+ |5 @8 i8 jet al. Current stretched penile length: cross-sectional study: Y1 m/ e3 [+ J
of 1040 healthy Turkish children aged 0 to 5 years. Urology
- {2 I- `! n& c9 r7 o1 k. I" `* ?2007;70:572 – 5.
7 X6 S) t6 h, ~/ H5 B18. Bay K, Asklund C, Skakkebaek NE, Andersson AM. Testicular
; e$ {: a2 y. D3 b3 j3 j' @dysgenesis syndrome: possible role of endocrine disruptors.
& h; ^" B# y* f9 V# [1 n. JBest Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;20:77 – 90.
8 ^4 q, l+ d* B4 m6 C m19. Czeizel A. Increasing trends in congenital malformations of male
/ E) U$ B& }4 x$ ~external genitalia. Lancet 1985;i:462 – 3.: A w( o& f5 g! @4 a# S% u
20. Matlai P, Beral V. Trends in congenital malformations of external; ?& F( Q. L7 [) a. V
genitalia. Lancet 1985;i:108.5 |" @ m! e- W" s2 S; W: \
23. Paulozzi LJ. International trends in rates of hypospadias% G2 b3 a4 G3 n* F
and cryptorchidism. Environ Health Perspect 1999;107:8 r8 L- r' v, f$ C( p+ k
297 – 302.
0 r! a) D' H2 \ N24. EUROCAT Working Group. EUROCAT report 7. 15 years of
6 h/ ~( @+ D4 c( msurveillance of congenital anomalies in Europe 1980 – 1994.
+ e- D2 ], t8 F' RBrussels, Belgium: Scientific Institute of Public Health-Louis& h: y$ P, z- a' O2 `, S- K3 i
Pasteur, 1997.) `; g, k# R3 y: M$ F* n% w r( H
25. Toppari J, Kaleva M, Virtanen HE. Trends in the incidence
$ r( h/ [$ g M. r% x' ~of cryptorchidism and hypospadias, and methodological
' A/ ?# e Z% q, U9 A. l4 D$ Vlimitations of registry-based data. Hum Reprod Update
" ~ O8 E; n, k7 v$ O6 ~' E% [2 e2001;7:282 – 6.
8 H& _& Q9 J$ Z26. Nassar N, Bower C, Barker A. Increasing prevalence of
$ n. D7 `2 h* f& Rhypospadias in Western Australia, 1980 – 2000. Arch Dis Child. E1 k9 o9 n# w9 z" w6 H: X
2007;92:580 – 4.7 ]6 j5 a) ^6 {; I7 B- j
27. Wang MH, Baskin LS. Endocrine disruptors, genital
, D) `/ w, h+ z& c! Jdevelopment, and hypospadias. J Androl 2008;29:499 – 505.
/ I9 P. n5 z9 v( w# c5 \2 e* K28. Morales-Su á rez-Varela MM, Toft GV, Jensen MS, Ramlau-Hansen, w& a: L# m) K7 Z2 H
C, Linda Kaerlev L, et al. Parental occupational exposure to3 h; [ A4 d2 ?4 H7 t
endocrine disrupting chemicals and male genital malfor-! G" ^" z7 i# U( V% }- N5 p
mations: a study in the Danish National Birth Cohort Study.( d1 I0 |7 R3 v% k. Y, v
Environ Health 2011;10:3.
$ l$ f# x. B/ s& m& P5 ?7 }3 K29. Gaspari L, Sampaio DR, Paris F, Audran F, Orsini M, et al. High; N0 H* `9 p5 B
prevalence of micropenis in 2710 male newborns from an3 Z5 X$ f9 K2 Z7 ]3 Z
intensive-use pesticide area of Northeastern Brazil. Int J Androl
# v( R: q+ N% H( J$ U8 Y0 I2012;35:253 – 64. |
|